Legal Opinion
Hatcher v. Harrah's NC Casino Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided July 2, 2002No. COA01-712PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUDSON, Judge.
Plaintiff appeals from an order granting defendant’s motion to dismiss based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons given below, we reverse in part and remand to the district court for further proceedings.
The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (the “IGRA”) provides a statutory framework for the regulation of gaming activities on Indian lands. See 25 U.S.C.A. §§ 2701-2721 (West 2001). The parties here do not dispute that the gaming at issue is “Class III gaming.” See 25 U.S.C.A. § 2703 (defining gaming classes). Class III gaming activities may be conducted on Indian…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Williams v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- White Mountain Apache Tribe v. BrackerSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Gaming Corporation of America Golden Nickel Casinos, Inc. v. Dorsey & Whitney, a Partnership, in Re Dorsey & Whitney, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Fuller v. EasleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Jackson County Ex Rel. Child Support Enforcement Agency v. SwayneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hatcher v. Harrah's NC Casino Company, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- In re J.G.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007