Legal Opinion

(PC) Hulbert v. Leckie

District Court, E.D. California

Decided April 18, 2024No. 2:22-cv-00082Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DARREN SCOTT HULBERT, No. 2:22-cv-00082 AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 F. LECKIE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, seeks relief pursuant to 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 I. Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints 20 As plaintiff was previously informed, the court is required to screen complaints brought 21 by prisoners seeking relief against “a governmental entity or officer or employee of a 22 governmental entity.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a).…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API