Ganus v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSampord, J.
We have examined the various exceptions reserved to the rulings of the trial court, without limitation. by reason of appellant’s brief; but a detailed discussion, other than herein appears, will not be necessary.
During the argument of the solicitor a colloquy occurred between the solicitor and one of defendant’s counsel over this remark of the solicitor, “I say it is cowardly to make an innuendo,- and not back it up.” Motion was made by defendant to exclude this remark, and. that the court declare a mistrial. The court excluded that part of the remark, “I say it is cowardly,” and instructed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Leverett v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
- Windom v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
- Jones v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1920
- Mitchell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
- Stewart v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hayes v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
- Hall v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1952
- Clark v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953