Legal Opinion

Ganus v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1923No. 6 Div. 170PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSampord, J.

We have examined the various exceptions reserved to the rulings of the trial court, without limitation. by reason of appellant’s brief; but a detailed discussion, other than herein appears, will not be necessary.

During the argument of the solicitor a colloquy occurred between the solicitor and one of defendant’s counsel over this remark of the solicitor, “I say it is cowardly to make an innuendo,- and not back it up.” Motion was made by defendant to exclude this remark, and. that the court declare a mistrial. The court excluded that part of the remark, “I say it is cowardly,” and instructed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Leverett v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Windom v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. Jones v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Mitchell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
  5. Stewart v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hayes v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Hall v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. Clark v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API