Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 18, 1922No. 7 Div. 760. [fn*]PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSameord, J.

A part of the evidence introduced by the defendant was by showings for six absent witnesses. The testimony of these witnesses constituted a large part of the defendant’s evidence tending to prove an alibi, which was his sole defense. The crime charged was of a most aggravating nature, calculated to impress the jury with the importance of a conviction, if the defendant was the guilty agent; and, while this fact should not unduly weigh in the deliberations of a jury considering a criminal ease, it sometimes happens that the heinousness of an offense, too often, seems to demand a victim, which…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cross v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  2. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  3. Moulton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  4. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  5. Lide v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Van Antwerp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  2. Hembree v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  3. McColston v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
  4. Hayes v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. Lumpkin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API