Mitchell v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSameord, J.
A part of the evidence introduced by the defendant was by showings for six absent witnesses. The testimony of these witnesses constituted a large part of the defendant’s evidence tending to prove an alibi, which was his sole defense. The crime charged was of a most aggravating nature, calculated to impress the jury with the importance of a conviction, if the defendant was the guilty agent; and, while this fact should not unduly weigh in the deliberations of a jury considering a criminal ease, it sometimes happens that the heinousness of an offense, too often, seems to demand a victim, which…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cross v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
- Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Moulton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
- Lide v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Van Antwerp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
- Hembree v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
- McColston v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
- Hayes v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
- Lumpkin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.