Legal Opinion · Dissent
Dedes v. Asch
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided August 2, 1994No. Docket Nos. 96420, 96421, (Calendar No. 11)Published
1DissentRiley, J.
Because the majority ignores the plain meaning of MCL 691.1407(2); MSA 3.996(107)(2) by eradicating governmental immunity for state employees who were not the sole cause of an injury, I respectfully dissent.
i
MCL 691.1407(2); MSA 3.996(107)(2) mandates in pertinent part:
[E]ach . . . employee of a governmental agency . . . shall be immune from tort liability for injuries to persons or damages to property caused by the . . . employee . . . while in the course of employment . . . while acting on behalf of a governmental agency if all of the following are met:(a) The . . . employee ... is acting…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ross v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Wade v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
- City of Lansing v. Township of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Melia v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Kirby v. LarsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.