Legal Opinion

Stotz v. Sabin Bros.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 5, 1977No. 47316PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Certiorari on the relation of Sabin Brothers and its compensation insurer to review a decision of the Worker’s Compensation Court of Appeals awarding compensation to employee, Jerome Stotz, for disability resulting from work-related injuries. The only significant issue is whether, as relators contend, the compensation court improperly disregarded the report of a neutral medical examiner. We hold that it did not and affirm.

Employee, a construction worker, was forced twice to jump some 8 feet to the ground when a 10-ton roller he was attempting to load onto a trailer began to tip. He felt pain…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dauphine v. City of Minneapolis, Department of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Miller v. Young, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  3. Ginsberg v. Pratt's Express Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Reider v. Anoka-Hennepin School District No. 11Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  2. Schaefer v. Dunwoody Industrial InstituteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Smith v. Civic Center ChryslerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. O'Rourke v. North Star Chemicals, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. Erickson v. Brown & BigelowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API