Legal Opinion

State v. Keene

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 5, 2001No. 00-0642PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CADY, Justice.

In this appeal we must decide whether the district court is required in accepting a plea of guilty to the crime of dissemination of obscene material to minors to make an independent review of the material claimed to be obscene. We conclude the district court is not required to make an independent review. We affirm the judgment and sentence of the district court.

I. Background Facts and Proceedings.

Justin Keene was charged by trial information with the crimes of solicitation, dissemination of obscene material to minors, and supplying alcohol to persons under the legal age. He…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. SchminkeySupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  2. Brainard v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  3. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  4. State v. GantSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  5. State v. MarsanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Craig Anthony FinneySupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  2. State Of Iowa Vs. Ricardo OrtizSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  3. State v. TateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
  4. State of Iowa v. Orlando David RodriguezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  5. State v. PhiloSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API