Legal Opinion

Morales v. Coyle

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided May 15, 2000No. 1:95 CV 2674PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ECONOMUS, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court upon Alfred Morales’ Petition Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 For Writ Of Habeas Corpus By A Person In State Custody (Dkt.# 12) (the “Application”). Morales alleges nineteen grounds for relief in the Application.

Also before the Court are Respondent’s Return of Writ (Dkt.# 14) (“ROW”), Petitioner Morales’ Traverse To Respondent Coyle’s Return Of The Writ (Dkt.# 25) (“Traverse”), and Respondent’s Reply To Petitioner’s Traverse (Dkt.# 28) (“Reply”).

For the reasons which follow, the Court denies the Application.

I.…

2Cases cited103 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Morales v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. Bonnell v. MitchelDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
  3. Ware v. HarryDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
  4. Harris v. StegallDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
  5. Montgomery v. BagleyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API