Legal Opinion · Dissent

In the Interest of D.M.B.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 29, 2015No. 04-14-00767-CVPublished

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION

Dissenting Opinion by:

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Because I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that Father made a general appearance by and through his court-appointed ad litem attorney in this parental termination case, thus waiving any complaint about service and failing to show error on the face of the record, I respectfully dissent. I believe this court has jurisdiction to review the merits of this restricted appeal from the judgment terminating Father’s parental rights.

In this case, Father opted to challenge the judgment by restricted appeal, as the Texas Rules of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Holick v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. In the Interest of G. M.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
  3. George Alexander D/B/A Zentner's Daughter Steakhouse v. Lynda's BoutiqueTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Primate Construction, Inc. v. SilverTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Norman Communications v. Texas Eastman Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API