Legal Opinion · Dissent

Davis v. Jacobs

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 13, 1981No. 80-2169; No. 80-6451; No. 80-6504; No. 80-6508; No. 80-6586; No. 80-6714; No. 80-6732; No. 80-6757; No. 80-6780; No. 80-6818; No. 80-6932; No. 81-358; No. 81-5021; No. 81-5071; No. 81-5082; No. 81-5118; No. 81-5138Published

1Dissent

Justice Rehnquist, with whom The Chief Justice and Justice Powell join,

dissenting.

In Jeffries v. Barksdale, 453 U. S. 914 (1981), The Chief Justice, Justice Powell, and I dissented from a simple denial of the writ of certiorari, contending that the writ should *916instead be dismissed because we had no jurisdiction to consider it. Further reflection and research have only strengthened my belief that where a specific statutory enactment dealing with our jurisdiction to consider decisions of the courts of appeals limits that jurisdiction to ‘Tejases in the courts of appeals,” 28 U. S. C. § 1254, we…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. De Beers Consolidated Mines, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. House v. MayoSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. United States Alkali Export Ass'n v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. In Re 620 Church Street Building Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Wells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API