Legal Opinion
Bowers v. Fred W. Amend Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided June 21, 1945No. 30832PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
1. The court did not abuse its discretion in overruling the motion for continuance, based upon the absence of an alleged material witness, where it was not shown that such witness lived in the county or had been subpoenaed, and where it appeared that the witness was serving overseas in the United States Army, and there was no reason to expect that he would be present at the next term of the court. Code, § 81-1410; Barlow v. State, 24 Ga. App. 122 (99 S. E. 798).
2. No error is shown in the disallowance of an amendment to the declaration offered by the plaintiff increasing the damages from…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sinkovitz v. Peters Land Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Cochrell v. Langley Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Walker v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Penn v. Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Wickham v. TorleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brown v. Bendix Radio Division of Bendix Aviation Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
- Criswell Baking Co. v. MilliganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Service Casualty Co. v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960