Criswell Baking Co. v. Milligan
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Dissent
My opinion is that the excerpt from the charge, complained of in ground three of the amended motions for new trials, is erroneous. The charge complained of is as follows: "Where either plaintiff might establish the unwholesome quality of the food and establish injury to the plaintiff from its consumption, and establish that the food as consumed by them was in the same condition as when it left the custody, possession and control of the defendant, these facts in themselves would sufficiently set forth defendant's negligence and make out a prima facie case, and then, gentlemen, the burden would…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Palmer Brick Co. v. ChenallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Monahan v. National Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Farrar v. FarrarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Macon Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. CraneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Cochrell v. Langley Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.