Legal Opinion

People v. McIntosh

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 1, 1992PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Titone, J.

This appeal concerns the ongoing effect, if any, that a CPL 450.50 (1) statement has after an appeal taken by the People pursuant to CPL 450.20 (8) has been withdrawn with the permission of the appellate court.

Following the trial court’s decision to suppress certain evidence that the People had intended to introduce at defen*89dant’s trial, the People filed a notice of appeal along with the required CPL 450.50 (1) statement, which asserted that the suppression order "rendered the sum of proof available to the People * * * either legally insufficient or so weak in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. KatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Forte v. Supreme CourtNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. MedinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Town of Oyster Bay v. Occidental Chemical Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1997
  3. People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. People v. Aldrich-O'SheaAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2004
  5. Board of Education v. Christa Construction, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API