Legal Opinion

Forte v. Supreme Court

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 23, 1979PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Gabrielli, J.

Whenever a criminal defendant’s pretrial motion to suppress evidence is granted, CPL 450.20 (subd 8) authorizes the People to appeal that determination to an intermediate appellate court provided that the People first file "a statement asserting that the deprivation of the use of the evidence ordered suppressed has rendered the sum of the proof available to the people with respect to a criminal charge which has been filed in the court either (a) insufficient as a matter of law, or (b) so weak in its entirety that any reasonable possibil*182ity of prosecuting such…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. MATTER OF STATE OF NY v. KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. La Rocca v. LaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Dondi v. JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Steingut v. GoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. B. T. Productions, Inc. v. BarrNew York Court of Appeals · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. People v. HowardNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Westchester Rockland Newspapers, Inc. v. LeggettNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. People v. KatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. McGinley v. HynesNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Corbin v. HilleryNew York Court of Appeals · 1989

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API