Charter Oak Life Insurance v. Gisborne
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of tlie district court of the third district, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts sufficiently appear from the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Boreman, J.:
This is an appeal from a judgment. In the spring of 1874, the appellant Matthew T. Gisborne, was the owner of one-third interest in the Mono mine, situated in the Ophir mining district, Tooele county, in this territory. He obtained a bond upon the other two-thirds from his co-owners, Embody, Miller, and Heaton, and then went to New York to *320sell tbis two-thirds. Failing- in tliis, be borrowed $100,000 witli which to buy the interest of Embody, one of his co-owners, which was four-eighteenths of the mine. The money was furnished through defendant Stephens, trustee, and paid to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Oliver v. PiattSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- Bacon v. RivesSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Railroad Co. v. DurantSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Barroilhet v. AnspacherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Motherwell v. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by5 opinions
- Connolly v. BouckCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Johnson v. GeddesUtah Supreme Court · 1916
- Brickell v. PowellMississippi Supreme Court · 1927
- Corporation of Members of Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. WatsonUtah Supreme Court · 1906
- Felkner v. DoolyUtah Supreme Court · 1904