Legal Opinion

Land v. State Farm Mutual Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 18, 1991No. 00878PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUDOCK, Judge:

Thomas Land, (Appellant), appeals from the judgment entered following the denial of his petition to set aside an arbitration award. We affirm.

The pertinent facts are as follows: This matter arises from an uninsured motorist arbitration proceeding. The proceeding was commenced pursuant to a contract of insur anee which provided that the Pennsylvania Uniform Acts of 1927 and 1980, as amended, 1 were applicable. The insurance policy likewise provided that each party shall select a competent and impartial arbitrator. These two would then select a third arbitrator. To this end,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. FioravantiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Thompson WillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Bole v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Bole v. Nationwide InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Florida Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. BrancoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  2. George v. SchirraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. McNeil v. JordanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. McCabe v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Delta Organization Inc. v. Salem Baptist Church, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API