Legal Opinion

Filyaw v. United States

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided September 16, 2025No. 3:24-cv-00699Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT DUANE FILYAW, Petitioner, No. 3:24-cv-699 (SRU) v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ORDER ON MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE, OR CORRECT SENTENCE Duane Filyaw filed a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence1 under

28 U.S.C. § 2255

on account of his counsel’s ineffective assistance at various stages of his criminal case. Mot. to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence, United States v. Filyaw, No. 3:24-cr-00699 (SRU), Doc. No. 1. For the following reasons, Filyaw’s motion is denied. I. Background On April 19, 2018, Duane Filyaw…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API