Legal Opinion

Whitcomb v. Spring Valley Coal Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois

Decided January 26, 1891PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtBlodgett, J.

The bill in this case charges the defendant with the infringement of reissued patents No. 9,408, granted October 12, 1880, to Sarah J. Harrison, guardiau of Jonathan W. Harrison, an insane person, and Charles R. Miller, assignee of one-half interest in said patent, for a “coal-mining machine,” (the original patent, No. 198,610, having been granted December 25, 1877, and issued to said Jonathan W. Harrison and J. E. Ingersoll, as assignee of one-half interest therein;) reissued patent No. 9,439, granted November 2,1880, to said Sarah J. Harrison, guardian, etc., John J. Harrison, and Orange…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. US v. Don Fernando De La Maza Arredondo & OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. Miller v. Brass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Philadelphia & Trenton Railroad v. StimpsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  4. Grant v. RaymondSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  5. Wilkes v. DinsmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1849

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Electric Auto-Lite Co. v. P. & D. MFG. CO.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  2. Beckwith Box Toe Co. v. GowdyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1916
  3. Moneyweight Scale Co. v. Toledo Computing Scale Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1912
  4. Baltz v. BottoDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1956
  5. Chicago Ry. Equipment Co. v. Perry Side Bearing Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API