Legal Opinion

State of Arizona v. Hooker

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1935No. Criminal No. 809PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, C. J.

George W. Hooker, hereinafter called defendant, was charged by information filed in the superior court of Yuma county with the offense of hawking, peddling and selling goods, wares and merchandise without a license. The charging part of the information reads as follows:

“That the said George W. Hooker on or about the 10th day of November, 1933, and before the filing of this information, at and in the County of Yuma, State of Arizona, did then and there, wilfully and unlawfully carry on the business of a peddler, itinerant vendor and traveling merchant, in the selling of goods, wares and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McKnight v. HodgeWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Commonwealth v. JenningsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  3. Smith v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  4. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878
  5. People v. SawyerMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re One 1965 Ford MustangArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  2. State v. LocksArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State v. LewisArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Ellenburg v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Ellenburg v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API