Legal Opinion

Milburn v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 3, 1977No. CR77-90PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

Appellant was convicted of possession of marijuana with intent to deliver and on appeal we reversed. Milburn v. State, 260 Ark. 553, 542 S.W. 2d 490 (1976). Upon retrial the court, sitting as a jury, found appellant guilty of the same offense and assessed his punishment at nine years’ imprisonment and a fine of $15,000. Appellant contends that the evidence was insufficient “to identify beyond a reasonable doubt that a green vegetable material” introduced into evidence was marijuana and, therefore, he was entitled to a directed verdict. Of course, on appellate review, it is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ark. State Highway Comm. v. RussellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  2. Neal v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  3. Gordon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  4. Milburn v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  5. Canal Insurance v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Boling v. GibsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. McCree v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  3. Swink & Co. v. Carroll McEntee & McGinley, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  4. Nard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  5. Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API