Legal Opinion

United Bank & Trust Co. v. Joyner

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1932No. Civil No. 3151PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

This is an action to recover the amount alleged to be due on a subscription to buy treasury stock of a corporation. There is no serious dispute as to the facts, the questions involved being principally of law, and we may state these facts as follows:

At some time previous to the spring of 1927, certain parties in the city of Tucson attempted to organize a corporation under the name of Tucson Independent Publishing Company, Inc., hereinafter called the company. The incorporators had taken some of the preliminary steps necessary to becoming a legal corporation under the laws of Arizona, but up…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Scovill v. ThayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Tracy v. . TalmageNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
  3. American National Insurance Co. v. TaborTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Inhabitants of Worcester v. EatonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
  5. Irwin v. . CurieNew York Court of Appeals · 1902

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Commercial Life Ins. Co. v. WrightArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Durham v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. of CaliforniaArizona Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Hunt v. Douglas Lumber Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Stern v. National City Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1938
  5. Jackson v. RobertsonArizona Supreme Court · 1962

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API