Legal Opinion

Austin v. Andrews

California Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1886No. 11216PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C. C.

This is an action of ejectment to recover possession of a small piece of land situate in San Joaquin County.

The case was tried by the court, and judgment rendered in favor of defendant, from which, and from an order denying a new trial, the plaintiff appealed.

The court found that the plaintiff was not the owner of the land when the action was commenced, nor when it was tried, and that the defendant was the owner of it, and entitled to its possession.

There was testimony tending to support the findings, and under the well-established rule in this court, we cannot say that a new…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sheils v. HaleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Randall v. FreedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Hamilton v. Consolidated Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. Partridge v. RussellNew York Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Annans v. SewellOregon Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API