Legal Opinion · Dissent

Tant v. Dan River, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 3, 1985No. 0488Published

1DissentGardner, Judge

I disagree with my brethren of the majority opinion. I would affirm the award of punitive damages made by the jury.

Where a jury verdict in a tort case is supported by a scintilla of relevant and credible evidence of record, the verdict must be affirmed on appeal. Jones v. Sun Publishing Co., 278 S. C. 12, 292 S. E. (2d) 23 (1982).

*147Dan River’s manufacturing business in Easley, South Carolina, involved the use of two coal burning furnaces from which a gaseous residue was emitted through a tall smokestack into the neighboring atmosphere. Immediately prior to November 1980 the furnaces were…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Atkinson v. Herington Cattle Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  2. Laurel Equip. Co. v. MATTHEWS, ET UX.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Jones v. Sun Publishing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  4. Martin v. MartinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API