Legal Opinion

Laurel Equip. Co. v. MATTHEWS, ET UX.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1953No. 38849PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLee, J.

Suit was filed by Mr. and Mrs. O. W. Matthews against Laurel Equipment Company to recover damages on account of the alleged negligent distribution of paint onto their adjacent premises. It was charged that their vegetables, flowers, shrubbery, etc., were ruined, and that the distasteful and obnoxious odors made them sick and prevented them from enjoying the peaceful occupancy and habitation of their premises. The demand was for $20,000.00.

The answer denied all material allegations. It also contained a demurrer, which was overruled; but on defendant’s motion, the court ordered to be stricken…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hadad v. LockebyMississippi Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Godfrey v. Meridian Light & Railway Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Southern Express Co. v. BrownMississippi Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad v. SandersMississippi Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Young v. WeaverMississippi Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Leaf River Forest Products, Inc. v. FergusonMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Shaw v. OWEN GIN COMPANYMississippi Supreme Court · 1956
  3. ALFRED JACKSON REDUCTION CO. v. DockeryMississippi Supreme Court · 1962
  4. City of West Point v. MeadowsMississippi Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Shutes v. Platte Chemical Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API