Legal Opinion

Hyatt Bros., Inc. Ex Rel. Hyatt v. Hyatt

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1989No. 88-74PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

We hold that the trial court erred in striking appellants’ demand for jury trial under W.R.C.P. 38(b)(1), in an action for the recovery of money allegedly wrongfully diverted from a close corporation and from one of the minority shareholders of the corporation and for other relief.

We remand the case for jury trial. In light of our remand, we need not answer the other questions raised since the mat ters to which they relate will be decided on retrial.

PARTIES

The appellants are:

1. Hyatt Brothers, Inc., a close corporation, on the relation of Dorothy C. Hyatt, a minority…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. BombolisSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Depinto v. Provident Security Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Weltzin v. NailSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  2. McNeill Family Trust v. Centura BankWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Cheek v. ZerbeWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  4. BARNHART DRILLING CO. INC. v. Petroleum Financing, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Gentry v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API