Legal Opinion

Coffey v. Tiffany

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 6, 1914PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court.- — Hon. Harris Robinson, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, J. —

This is a malpractice suit. Defendants are practicing physicians in Kansas City and specialize in diseases of the eye. Each has had long experience in that profession and is recognized as a skillful and able practitioner. During the events in controversy Dr. Howard had his office with Dr. Tiffany and practiced both independently and as the assistant of Dr. Tiffany.

Plaintiff, a spinster forty-seven years of age, was a teacher of piano music and lived with her sister who was a school teacher. She had. always been nearsighted and had worn glasses since early youth. According to her…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ewing v. GoodeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1897
  2. Staloch v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  3. Martin v. Walter CourtneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  4. Spain v. BurchMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Humphreys v. RobersonTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Markart v. ZeimerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. Baird v. National Health FoundationMissouri Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. Snyder v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API