Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Gilbert

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 6, 2015No. Supreme Court Case 13SA254PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marquez

{ 1 In this attorney discipline proceeding, the respondent, Juliet Carol Gilbert, agreed to provide certain immigration-related legal services to Christopher Henderson and Vice-toria Peters for a flat fee. The written fee agreement did not include milestones or otherwise describe what payment, if any, the clients would owe Gilbert if the representation ended before she completed all of the specific tasks identified in the agreement. When her clients terminated the representation early, Gilbert retained a portion of the fees advanced by the clients as compensation for the approximately…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dudding v. Norton Frickey & AssociatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  2. Melat, Pressman & Higbie, L.L.P. v. Hannon Law Firm, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2012
  3. Olsen and Brown v. City of EnglewoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  4. In re SatherSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  5. In re HainesSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In re Villas at Highland Park Homeowners Ass'n v. Villas at Highland Park, LLCSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
  2. In re KleinsmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
  3. Larson, P.C. v. GrinnanColorado Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. tte v. Owners Ins. CoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020
  5. Cahey v. International Business Machines CorporationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2020

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API