Walker v. Tink

The first, second and third assignments of error on this record are : First, the court erred in finding that Columbus T. Walker was not entitled to dower and homestead interests in the lands in controversy; second, the court erred in finding the said Walker was chargeable with the rents and profits during the time he occupied said premises; third, the court erred in dismissing the cross-bill of the appellants for want of equity.

This case was before this court at a former term, to which reference is made for the statement of facts. The opinion is reported as Tink v. Walker, 148 Ill. 234. The…