Gary Frye v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Senior Judge:
Following a bench trial, appellant was found guilty of simple assault on Jewel Parker. He contends on appeal that Ms. Parker’s statements in answer to the lone question “what happened” by a police officer responding to a report of an assault were admitted in evidence in violation of his constitutional right to confront Parker, who did not testify at trial. Agreeing with the trial judge that the statements were not “testimonial” in the circumstances, hence were not reached by the Sixth Amendment, we affirm. 1
I
Two Metropolitan Police officers arrived at a house on Texas…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Michigan v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Hammon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- ANDREW WILLS v. UNITED STATES.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- DANNY ANDRADE v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. AlersSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- State v. AlersSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- Austin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.