Legal Opinion

Denver & Rio Grande Ry. Co. v. Glasscott

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 15, 1878PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to County Court of Arapahoe County. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtThatcher, C. J.

Robert A. Glasscott was a conductor of the defendant company. He brought suit against the company for the balance claimed to be due him for services as conductor rendered to the company, laying his damages at five hundred dollars, for which sum a verdict was returned and judgment entered in the court below. Unless the defendant was entitled to an offset, no dispute arises as to the correctness of the judgment. The company by its pleas and proof offered to offset against the claim of the conductor, the sum of fifteen hundred dollars, which it is alleged that he, as conductor, had collected…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City Bank of Brooklyn v. . DearbornNew York Court of Appeals · 1859

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Young v. Colorado National Bank of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  2. Holy Cross Gold Mining & Milling Co. v. O'SullivanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API