Legal Opinion

Holy Cross Gold Mining & Milling Co. v. O'Sullivan

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1900No. 3921PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to the District Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Campbell

The defendant in error, O’Sullivan, plaintiff below, was employed by plaintiff in error, the Holy Cross Gold-Mining and Milling Company, defendant below, to work in its gold mine, and while engaged in cleaning out a tunnel, what the witnesses call a “ missed hole ” or “ missed shot ” (that is, an unexploded charge of powder), was exploded, producing an injury to plaintiff, for which he brought this suit to recover damages, alleging that the proximate cause of the injury was the negligence of the defendant in not exercising ordinary care to discover and remove the “ missed shot.” There was a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Noonan v. Caledonia Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Combs v. Agricultural Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1892
  3. Parker v. Portland Publishing Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1879
  4. Hopkins v. Indianapolis & St. Louis RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Buxton v. Somerset Potters' WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Young v. Colorado National Bank of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API