Grabler Manufacturing Co. v. Wrobel
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.
Two questions are presented by the record: (1) Whether there was evidence tending to show that Wrobel’s death was the result of an injury occasioned in the course of his employment; and (2) whether the trial court erred in excluding evidence tendered in the trial of the case.
As pointed out in the opinion in Industrial Commission v. Weigandt, 102 Ohio St., 1, 130 N. E., 38, the Legislature would not have power to make any broader provision than the Constitution of the state authorized it to make, and the language there (Article II, Section 35) used in authorizing the payment of compensation is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Washington Ex Rel. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co. v. FairchildSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Industrial Commission v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1928
- Industrial Commission v. RamseyOhio Supreme Court · 1928
- Industrial Commission v. HilshorstOhio Supreme Court · 1927
3Cited by19 opinions
- McNees v. Cincinnati Street Ry. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1949
- Marlow v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1967
- Industrial Commission v. NelsonOhio Supreme Court · 1933
- Merz v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1938
- Ohio v. Chattanooga Boiler & Tank Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.