Legal Opinion

Trompler, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 1, 2003No. 01-3606, 01-3987PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POSNER, Circuit Judge.

Trompler is a nonunion machine shop that employs 30 workers in three shifts. The second shift runs from 2 to 10 p.m. and is staffed by eight workers, including a supervisor (“leadman”). One day, six of the eight walked off the job shortly after their shift began, without telling the employer in advance, and as a result production ceased until the workers who work the third shift arrived at 10. The president of the company met with the six workers the next day. There is disagreement over what they told her, but the Board found, not clearly erroneously, that it was that…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Allentown MacK Sales & Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. American Ship Building Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Washington Aluminum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Textile Workers Union v. Darlington Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Efrain Santos and Benedicto Diaz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  2. Briggs v. Nova ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Briggs v. Nova ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Lourdes Medical Center v. Board of ReviewSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
  5. Hoesten v. BestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API