Poindexter v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the CourtRagland, J.
Plaintiff’s intestate; Harry Poindexter, was in the employ of defendant as car inspector and light repair man in its switchvard at Terre Haute, Indiana. Oh the morning of November 4'. 1922, while he was standing in an open space between two freight cars on one of its tracks, engaged in repairing á coupler, defendant’s servants, negligently it is alleged, kicked two other cars in .on the same track and against' the string of cars on one side of the open space, causing them to run over him. His death instantly followed. Re- spoñdent seeks a recovery under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act. .…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Illinois Central Railroad v. BehrensSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- St. Louis, San Francisco & Texas Railway Co. v. SealeSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Erie Railroad Company v. WinfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stottle v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1929
- Gandy v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
- Jarvis v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
- Roach v. Los Angeles & S. L. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1929
- Bartosik v. Chicago River & Indiana RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1932