Legal Opinion

Hahn v. National American Fire Ins.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 3, 1939PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShain, P. J.

— -In this action plaintiffs (partners) seek to recover from defendant for loss by fire of an automobile covered by a policy issued by defendant wherein one Harold Brown was designated as assured and wherein it is stated that said automobile was at the time subject to a mortgage lien to plaintiffs in the sum of $446>.

Language of the policy, as to payment of loss, contains the following: “Subject to all the provisions, exclusions, conditions and warranties contained in this policy, loss, if any, payable, as interest may appear, to Assured and Hahn Motor Company.”

The trial in this cause was by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hathaway v. Orient InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Moore v. Hanover Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Collinsville Savings Society v. Boston InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
  4. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. German Mutual Fire InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1937
  5. Harrington v. Fitchburg Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. St. Louis County National Bank v. Maryland Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Conner v. Northwestern National Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. Semo Motor Co. v. National Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  4. Brown v. State Auto. Ins. Ass'n, Auto. Underwriters Corp., Des MoinesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
  5. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API