Legal Opinion

Wright v. Cnty. of San Mateo

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided March 29, 2019No. A153687Published

1Opinion of the CourtPollak, P. J.

Revenue and Taxation Code1 section 69.5, which implements Proposition 60, enacted by voters in 1986, allows qualified homeowners over 55 years of age to transfer *518the property tax basis of their principal residence to a replacement dwelling of equal or lesser value in the same county. (Stats. 1987, ch. 186, § 1; Cal. Const., art. XIII A, § 2, subd. (a).) The purpose of the legislation is to provide tax relief to qualified homeowners. (Ibid. )

Here, the County of San Mateo (county) determined that plaintiffs Richard S. Wright and Susan M. Hansch, who are otherwise qualified under the statute,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hutton v. Fidelity National Title Co.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Avila v. Standard Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Wunderlich v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Grotenhuis v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API