Finova Capital Corp. v. Nicolette
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HESTER, Judge:
Finova Capital Corporation, successor-in-interest to Bell Atlantic-Tricon Leasing Corporation, appeals the determination of the trial court that it may not collect a deficiency judgment against appellees,1 Robert A. Holst, Helarion A. Beronilla, Jr., Charles Chang, Samuel Flannagan, Yahya Fadl, Angel Baleita, Barid B. Jana, Paul Dascani, Gregory Spain, William Hughes, and Life-care X-ray, Inc. We affirm.
Appellant entered into equipment leases in California with appellees for certain medical equipment. When appellees defaulted under the leases, appellant sold the equipment…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Robinson v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Atlas Thrift Co. v. HoranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Crocker National Bank v. EmeraldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Hercules v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Security Pacific National Bank v. GeernaertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ruby v. Delta Mining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997