Legal Opinion

Finova Capital Corp. v. Nicolette

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 14, 1997No. Nos. 00129 and 00729PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HESTER, Judge:

Finova Capital Corporation, successor-in-interest to Bell Atlantic-Tricon Leasing Corporation, appeals the determination of the trial court that it may not collect a deficiency judgment against appellees,1 Robert A. Holst, Helarion A. Beronilla, Jr., Charles Chang, Samuel Flannagan, Yahya Fadl, Angel Baleita, Barid B. Jana, Paul Dascani, Gregory Spain, William Hughes, and Life-care X-ray, Inc. We affirm.

Appellant entered into equipment leases in California with appellees for certain medical equipment. When appellees defaulted under the leases, appellant sold the equipment…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Robinson v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Atlas Thrift Co. v. HoranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Crocker National Bank v. EmeraldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Hercules v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Security Pacific National Bank v. GeernaertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ruby v. Delta Mining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API