Legal Opinion
Holder v. City of Vancouver
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 5, 2006No. 34341-0-IIPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶l Lee and Gina Holder (Holder), appearing pro se, appeal a hearing examiner’s final order that Holder violated Vancouver Municipal Code (VMC) section 17.14.290 by parking or storing several vehicles on unimproved surfaces. The superior court affirmed the hearing examiner and dismissed the Land Use Petition Act (LUPA) action under chapter 36.70C RCW, and Holder appealed. But Holder’s opening and reply briefs do not refer to chapter 36.70C RCW, and he stated at oral argument *106that he was not pursuing his appeal under LUPA. He argues only that res judicata barred the city from issuing a notice…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Rains v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Seattle-First National Bank v. Shoreline Concrete Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
- Hilltop Terrace Homeowner's Ass'n v. Island CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. WoodWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- Van Sant v. City of EverettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Mitchell v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Brotherton v. Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Orris v. LingleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Mitchell v. STATE DEPT. OF CORRECTIONSCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Mitchell v. STATE DEPT. OF CORRECTIONSCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.