Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kramer v. Weedhopper of Utah, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 25, 1986No. 84-2656Published

1DissentJustice Stamos

I respectfully dissent from the opinion of the court.

As noted by the majority, this case is here on appeal from the eircuit court’s granting of summary judgment. Summary judgment should be granted where there are no genuine issues of material fact and where the pleadings, depositions and other evidence before the court in the motion for summary judgment show that at trial a verdict would have to be directed. (Fooden v. Board of Governors (1971), 48 Ill. 2d 580, 587, 272 N.E.2d 497, cert, denied (1972), 408 U.S. 943, 33 L. Ed. 2d 766, 92 S. Ct. 2847; Pedersen v. Joliet Park District (1985),…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fooden v. Board of GovernorsIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Garcia v. Joseph Vince Co.California Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Schmidt v. Archer Iron Works, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1970
  4. McCreery v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Wetzel v. Eaton Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API