Legal Opinion

In Re the Guardianship of Coburn

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 29, 1909No. Civ. No. 632PublishedCited by 15 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Mateo County, and from an order denying a new trial. George H. Buck, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

In the month of February, 1908, a petition was filed by Azro A. Coburn, a resident of Massachusetts, to have Loren Coburn, his aged uncle, who resides in San Mateo county, adjudged incompetent, and to have a guardian appointed of his person and estate. The petition as amended alleges that the said Loren Coburn, by reason of old age, physical disability and weakness of mind, is unable to take care of himself and manage his property. This allegation was denied, and upon the issue so made the case went to trial before the court without a jury.

At the conclusion of the trial the court made an…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Estate of DolbeerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Field v. ShorbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Smith v. BelshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. In re to Appoint a Guardian for StorickMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  5. In re to Appoint a Special Guardian for BassettMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re the Guardianship of CoburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Taylor v. Savings Union Bank & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Felsenthal v. WarringCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. People v. O'BrienCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Schulmeyer v. McAllisterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API