Legal Opinion
Wepsic v. Josephson (In Re Wepsic)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California
Decided August 26, 1999No. 19-00412PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM DECISION
JOHN H. HARGROVE, Bankruptcy Judge.
At issue is debtor Diane Mannion Wep-sic’s (“Wepsic”) request for her costs and attorney fees pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1640(a).
This Court has jurisdiction to determine this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334 and 157(b)(1) and General Order No. 312-D of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B) and (K).
FACTS
The facts set forth in this Court’s September 1, 1998, Memorandum Decision are incorporated herein. This Court granted partial…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Susan J. Carroll v. Wolpoff & AbramsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Daggett v. KimmelmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Semar v. Platte Valley Federal Savings & Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- In Re Maruko Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sunstone Behavioral Health, Inc. v. Alameda County Medical CenterDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
- Beeler v. Stanton (In Re Stanton)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Washington · 1999