State v. Riddle
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Per curiam
The sole assignment of error presented by both defendants on this appeal is whether or not there was sufficient evidence in the record to support the jury’s verdicts of guilty and the judgments and commitments entered thereon. In determining whether there is evidence sufficient for the judge to submit a case to the jury, “all admitted evidence favorable to the State, whether competent or incompetent, must be considered and must be deemed true. [Citations omitted.] The question for the Court is whether there is substantial evidence to support a finding both that an offense charged in the bill…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. RosemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. IrwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. BatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.