Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Casper v. Board of Trustees of Wisconsin Retirement Fund

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1966PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

We recently said in Firemen’s Annuity and Benefit Fund v. Krueger (1964), 24 Wis. (2d) 200, 128 N. W. (2d) 670, that review proceedings where certiorari is permitted must be commenced within six months from the entry of the order sought to be reviewed. This was said in reference to cases where no time was prescribed by the ordinance or statute creating the right of review. In that case and in some prior cases, this court considered the timeliness of the review to be governed by the doctrine of laches. McClutchey v. Milwaukee County (1941), 239 Wis. 139, 300 N. W. 224, 300 N. W. 917; Wurth v.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Barry Laboratories, Inc. v. State Board of PharmacyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. State ex rel. Dalrymple v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Lakeshore Development Corp. v. Plan CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Consolidated Apparel Co. v. Common Council of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  5. State ex rel. Kulike v. Town Clerk of the LebanonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Browndale International, Ltd. v. Board of AdjustmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Thomas D. Nowell v. City of WausauWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Gordie Boucher Lincoln-Mercury Madison, Inc. v. City of Madison Plan CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
  4. State Ex Rel. Ruthenberg v. Annuity & Pension Board of City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State Ex Rel. Czapiewski v. Milwaukee City Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API