Legal Opinion
Browndale International, Ltd. v. Board of Adjustment
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided June 18, 1973No. 403PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
Dane county, for zoning purposes, is divided into 13 districts. Sec. 10.02 (1), Ordinance. The district in question is an A-l agricultural district. Under sec. 10.12 (1) of the ordinance, certain “permitted uses” for an A-l agricultural district are enumerated. Site approval is not required. One such “use” is a “single family detached dwelling unit.” Under sec. 10.12 (2) of the ordinance other enumerated uses are' also permitted but only upon first obtaining site approval.
Sec. 10.01 (18) (a) of the ordinance defines a “single family dwelling” as: “A building designed for and occupied…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Scharping v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Buhler v. Racine CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Wisconsin Labor Relations Board v. Fred Rueping Leather Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- State ex rel. Tingley v. GurdaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- State Ex Rel. Kaczkowski v. Fire & Police CommissionersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Crowley v. KnappWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Thorp v. Town of LebanonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- Costley v. Caromin House, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- In Re Appeal of MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Penobscot Area Housing Development Corp. v. City of BrewerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.