Gibbs v. Commercial & Savings Bank
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGates, P. J.
This case was tried before a referee. He took the evidence and made findings of fact and conclusions of law' favorable to plaintiff and reported them to. the trial court, which upon the hearing made them the findings and conclusions of the court and entered judgment accordingly. The appeal is from the 'judgment. No motion for new trial was made. It is therefore! urged by respondent that the evidence is not properly before this court, and that we cannot review the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the findings. Rule 44 of trial courts of record (40 S. D., prelim, p. 35), provides:
“The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Shotwell v. Sioux Falls Savings BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
- Dunn v. GambleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bahlkow v. PrestonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
- Berg v. Union State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Boyle v. Vivian State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- Finck v. LarsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
- Thompson v. Commercial & Savings BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926