Legal Opinion

Dayton Independent School District v. U.S. Mineral Products Co.

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided February 12, 1992No. Civ. A. B-87-507-CAPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOE J. FISHER, District Judge.

ON THIS DAY came on for consideration Defendants, W.R. Grace & Co.Conn.’s and United States Gypsum Company’s, Motions for Summary Judgment concerning the application of the Statute of Repose, Tex.Civ.Prac. & Rem.Code, Sections 16.008 and 16.009. The Court, having considered the extensive briefing by both Plaintiffs and Defendants, finds that the Defendants are not afforded protection by either Section.

Grace argues that it is entitled to the protection of Tex.Civ.Prac. & Rem.Code, Sections 16.008 and 16.009. United States Gypsum relies on Section 16.009…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Rosenberg v. Town of North BergenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  3. City of Mason v. West Texas Utilities Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Freezer Storage, Inc. v. Armstrong Cork Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Burmaster v. Gravity Drainage Dist. No. 2Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1978

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Williams v. U.S. Natural Resources, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1993
  2. Brown v. Overhead Door Corp.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1994
  3. Petro Stopping Centers, Inc. v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1995
  4. Cathy Williams v. U.S. Natural Resources, Inc. D/B/A Friedrich Air Conditioning and Refrigeration Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1993
  5. Sonnier v. Chisholm-Ryder Co., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API