Legal Opinion

Cathy Williams v. U.S. Natural Resources, Inc. D/B/A Friedrich Air Conditioning and Refrigeration Company

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided September 15, 1993No. 10-92-00250-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Williams v. U.S Nat Resources

IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-92-250-CV

CATHY WILLIAMS, ET AL.,

Appellants

v.

U.S. NATURAL RESOURCES, INC.

D/B/A FRIEDRICH AIR CONDITIONING

AND REFRIGERATION COMPANY,

Appellee

From the 170th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court # 92-2749-4

CONCURRING OPINION

I write separately because, guided by the Code Construction Act (the Act), Chapter 311 of the Government Code, I believe that the benefits of the statute of repose in question should be available only to contractors, their subcontractors, and the agents, servants and employees of each. See Tex. Govt.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ellerbe v. Otis Elevator Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Sowders v. M.W. Kellogg Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1983
  3. Dubin v. Carrier Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
  4. Reddix v. Eaton Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1983
  5. prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 13,017 Linda Dedmon, Etc. v. Stewart-Warner Corp., Third-Party and v. Donald Hampton, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API