Legal Opinion

Adkins v. Barnhart

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided January 7, 2005No. 203CV00115Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JONES, Chief Judge.

In this social security case, the plaintiff objects to the report of the magistrate judge recommending that the court affirm the Commissioner’s determination that the plaintiff is not disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act. Upon review, I find that the mandate rule requires me to overrule the plaintiffs objections and hold that the Commissioner’s determination is supported by substantial evidence.

I. Background.

The plaintiff, David K. Adkins, applied to the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) for supplemental security income (“SSI”)…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Charles M. Laws v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
  2. Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Coffman v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
  4. William King, the of the Will of Vernie C. Reece v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
  5. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Rios-PinedaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API