Legal Opinion

State v. Carroll

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 12, 1977No. 10565PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BILLINGS, Chief Judge.

Appellant prosecutes this appeal from a determination by the trial court of his competency to stand trial. We affirm.

Appellant was convicted of forcible rape and in his first appeal we reversed the judgment and remanded the case for a competency hearing under § 552.020, RSMo 1973 Supp. State v. Carroll, 543 S.W.2d 48 (Mo.App.1976).

*101The trial court conducted a hearing and found appellant had no mental disease or defect and he had the capacity to understand the proceedings against him and assist in his defense. Appellant was then resentenced.

In this appeal the appellant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. CarrollMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Carroll v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API