Legal Opinion
Rizzo v. Mindes
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided April 2, 2009No. 19-10178PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MARK W. VAUGHN, Chief Judge.
Anna and David Rizzo (the “Plaintiffs”) brought a complaint pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code, 1 in which they objected to the dischargeability of an alleged obligation of Sean C. Mindes (the “Defendant”) to them, relating to a remodeling and construction contract (the “project” or the “contract”) that the Defendant agreed to perform at the Plaintiffs’ property. Beginning August 14, 2008, the Court held a trial. In rendering this opinion, the Court determines the discharge-ability of the claim, and not the Defendant’s…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Palmacci v. UmpierrezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- McCrory v. Spigel (In Re Spigel)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Mellon Bank Corporation and Mellon Bank, N.A., in No. 90-3712 v. First Union Real Estate Equity and Mortgage Investments, in No. 90-3790Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Christine A. Craft, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Metromedia, Inc., Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McGraw v. Collier (In re Collier)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2013
- FIA Card Services, N.A. v. Finnerty (In Re Finnerty)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 2009
- In re: Amber Elizabeth Kopanski v. Rumizen & Weisman Co., Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2026